OK, Saddam’s in jail and Iraq is the fifty-first (and best-funded) state. Are we better off than we were a year ago?
Slate‘s Jacob Weisberg asked a prominent group of “liberal hawks” to reassess their support for the war in light of what we now know. While he does not bring up issues relating to the Administration’s morality or mendacity–not to mention the horrible precedent of the world’s only superpower launching an allegedly “preventive” war–Weisberg offers a useful summary of what’s gone wrong from a narrowly pragmatic point of view:
There is “the huge and growing cost of the invasion and occupation: in American lives (we’re about to hit 500 dead and several thousand more have been injured); in money (more than $160 billion in borrowed funds); and in terms of lost opportunity (we might have found Osama Bin Laden by now if we’d committed some of those resources to Afghanistan). Most significant are the least tangible costs: increased hatred for the United States, which both fosters future terrorism and undermines the international support we will need to fight terrorism effectively for many years to come.”
Of the group of eight, Kenneth Pollack, George Packer and Fred Kaplan have all come to regret their previous arguments to various degrees. Pollack, who is a bit equivocal on this point, lays responsibility on his own overestimation of the dictator’s WMD capacity. Fair enough; this was something on which reasonable people could disagree, and as Paul Wolfowitz later admitted, was chosen by the Bush Administration as the focus of its propaganda efforts because of its perceived political potency. Kaplan (who changed his mind before the war began) and Packer lay the blame on the Administration’s postwar incompetence, which, they believe, makes a mockery of the sacrifices it has demanded from this country and from the Iraqis themselves.
The “I’m Still a Hawk” club includes Thomas Friedman, Paul Berman, Christopher Hitchens and Fareed Zakaria. I think we can eliminate Hitchens from the ranks of prowar liberals at the start. As a leftist, he heaped Cockburn-like contempt on liberals; today it’s more of the Horowitzian variety. In either incarnation, he has had little use for Isaiah Berlin or John Dewey. Neither does it make sense to include Fareed Zakaria, who is a protégé of the neoconservative Samuel Huntington (and, like Huntington, a critic of “too much democracy”) and an unrepentant Reaganite. A smart conservative does not a liberal make.
- Dominic Cummings: Sorry seemed to be the hardest word for the PM's right hand man
- Hungarian Justice Minister Tells EU: ‘Sorry Seems to Be the Hardest Word’
- Coronavirus: Barnard Castle's TripAdvisor page flooded with spoof Dominic Cummings reviews
- Coronavirus: Dominic Cummings says 'I don't regret what I did' over lockdown trips
- Coronavirus: Ireland records no new COVID-19 deaths as Varadkar hails 'day of hope'
- Coronavirus: PM banks on easing lockdown to deflect from Cummings controversy
- Coronavirus: All non-essential retail shops can reopen in England from 15 June, Johnson says
- Coronavirus: Spain to welcome tourists from 1 July with no quarantine
- JAN MOIR: Dominic Cummings sounded practically human at first. But as the garden grilling wore on, my goodwill fizzled out like damp charcoal
- How I'm Living Now: Lisa Kudrow, Actress and Producer
- Ink Master contestant Daniel Silva is charged with the MURDER of his YouTube star friend Corey La Barrie following fatal car crash in Los Angeles
- The Social Tattle
‘Sorry’ Seems to Be the Hardest Word have 564 words, post on www.thenation.com at January 29, 2004. This is cached page on VietNam Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.