President TrumpDonald John TrumpGiuliani threatens to go to court if Mueller subpoenas Trump Watergate prosecutor compares Trump to King George, a ‘flimflam artist’ Trump to host his first-ever Ramadan dinner: report MORE’s decision to impose steep steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico is threatening the ongoing negotiations over the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a key trade deal for all three economies.
Canada and Mexico had been temporarily exempted from the tariffs while they negotiated updates to NAFTA with the Trump administration.
But with an end-of-the-month deadline looming to make a decision, Trump opted to hit the nation’s two largest trading partners with duties of 25 percent on steel and 10 percent on aluminum.
“It’s nerve-wracking. I would consider, at this point, that NAFTA is really at risk,” said Sherman Robinson, a trade expert at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
The U.S. is imposing the tariffs under the rarely used Section 232 of a trade law that allows the president to impose tariffs for national security reasons.
Republicans on Capitol Hill have expressed deep disdain for Trump’s actions, warning against a trade confrontation with major allies.
“I don’t think anything good will come out of a trade war,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellKentucky GOP chief: ‘Nobody likes’ Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminum McConnell warns Trump: Don’t get ‘snookered’ by North Korea McConnell: Trump should ‘pull back from the brink’ on tariffs MORE (R-Ky.) said Friday.
“And I hope we pull back from the brink here because these tariffs will not be good for the economy, and I worry that it will slow, if not impede significantly, the progress we were making economically in U.S.,” he said.
Other critics of the Trump tariffs say that the president is using national security as a pretext for imposing tariffs.
“Claiming steel bought from our allies is a ‘national security’ threat weakens our credibility. These tariffs, i.e. taxes, hurt American workers, employers and consumers,” Sen. Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeyWH backpedals on Trump’s ‘due process’ remark on guns Top GOP candidate drops out of Ohio Senate race Newly declassified memos detail extent of improper Obama-era NSA spying MORE (R-Pa.) tweeted on Friday.
Commerce Secretary Wilbur RossWilbur Louis RossTrump defends policies: US must be ‘treated fairly’ on trade Threats of retaliatory tariffs prompted by Trump have cost Iowa pork industry 0M: report Some US companies say Trump’s tariffs are already hurting their business MORE said Thursday on CNBC that the decision to impose the tariffs is a “reflection that the [NAFTA] discussions didn’t get far enough to justify another postponement or an exemption.”
But both Canada and Mexico have repeatedly said they won’t bend if Trump uses the economic penalties as leverage in the NAFTA talks.
“The Trump strategy is very dangerous. All these countries, I think, are likely to gang up on the United States, both in political and economic terms,” said Charles Doran, director of Canadian studies at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.
“The old Canada-U.S. deal could suit Canada better than NAFTA,” he said.
Rufus Yerxa, head of the National Foreign Trade Council, said that while he doesn’t envision Trump withdrawing from NAFTA, the prospects for a deal are severely hampered by the tariffs.
“We can’t expect business as usual with them when we’re basically throwing out the rule book on trade and taking all kinds of unprecedented actions,” Yerxa said.
“Things were tough on the outstanding issues with NAFTA, they’ll get even more tense now, and it will be harder for us to get a positive outcome,” he said.
Mexico and Canada each announced their own retaliatory tariffs on a wide range of U.S goods Thursday, further inflaming tensions.Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanThe Memo: Trade war shadows Trump victory lap on economy McConnell: Trump should ‘pull back from the brink’ on tariffs Paul Ryan raised 0k for House Republicans in Ohio fundraising swing MORE (R-Wis.) had said that a deal on NAFTA needed to be reached by May 17 for Congress to be able to consider it under the time constraints set out in fast-track rules.
Even if U.S. Trade Representative Robert LighthizerRobert (Bob) Emmet LighthizerMcConnell urges GOP senators to call Trump about tariffs Companies brace for trade war MORE can reach an agreement this year, it would be up to the next Congress — one whose composition will be determined by the November midterm elections — to ratify it.
Simon Lester, a trade analyst at the Cato Institute, said the tariffs make the NAFTA talks more challenging, though not necessarily impossible.
“Having said that, the NAFTA talks seem to be going very badly,” Lester said.
“The political calendar is becoming difficult, and it’s not clear that the governments are willing to make the necessary compromises,” he said.
“So a completed NAFTA seems very unlikely anytime soon, but with the chaos and surprises we are seeing these days, I suppose anything is possible.”
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Thursday claimed that a NAFTA agreement nearly at hand, but said the Trump administration derailed the talks by insisting on a five-year sunset clause.
“I had to highlight that there was no possibility of any Canadian prime minister signing a NAFTA deal that included a five-year sunset clause,” Trudeau said.
“And obviously the visit didn’t happen.”
Trump, Trudeau and other world leaders are slated to meet next week when Canada hosts a Group of 7 meeting in Quebec. So far, Trump has shown no signs of backing down.
“The United States has been taken advantage of for many decades on trade. Those days are over,” Trump said in a statement on Thursday.
“Earlier today, this message was conveyed to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada: The United States will agree to a fair deal, or there will be no deal at all.”
Trump followed up Friday morning by writing, “Canada has treated our Agricultural business and Farmers very poorly for a very long period of time. Highly restrictive on Trade! They must open their markets and take down their trade barriers!”
Later on Friday, Trump said he wouldn’t mind having separate trade deals with Mexico and Canada.
Trump’s hardening trade position is creating frustration on Capitol Hill, prompting some Republicans to talk of possible legislative action.
Several GOP senators on Friday expressed support for limiting the president’s trade powers and requiring congressional approval to impose tariffs.
On Friday, Toomey became the fifth GOP senator to sign onto such legislation, spearheaded by Sen. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeMcConnell: Trump should ‘pull back from the brink’ on tariffs Overnight Finance: Trump breaks protocol to tout jobs data | Economy adds 223K jobs in May | Trump defiant on tariffs | Battle begins over future of sports betting GOP senator to back bill to ‘rein in’ Trump’s trade authority MORE (Utah), and supported by Sens. Jeff FlakeJeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeOvernight Finance: Trump breaks protocol to tout jobs data | Economy adds 223K jobs in May | Trump defiant on tariffs | Battle begins over future of sports betting GOP senator to back bill to ‘rein in’ Trump’s trade authority Trump refugee nominee demanded reparations from DACA recipients MORE (Ariz.), Cory GardnerCory Scott GardnerOvernight Finance: Trump breaks protocol to tout jobs data | Economy adds 223K jobs in May | Trump defiant on tariffs | Battle begins over future of sports betting GOP senator to back bill to ‘rein in’ Trump’s trade authority Officials disclose potential cellphone surveillance activity near White House MORE (Colo.) and Ben SasseBenjamin (Ben) Eric SasseThe Memo: Trade war shadows Trump victory lap on economy Trade wars don’t appear to be the easy wins we were promised McConnell: Trump should ‘pull back from the brink’ on tariffs MORE (Neb.).
“Congress should assert its constitutional responsibility and lead on trade policy so Americans keep access to affordable goods and services, and the opportunity to sell our products abroad,” Toomey said.
“If this devolves into a full-blown trade war, the resulting harm will undo all of the great economic progress we’ve made with deregulation and tax reform.”
- Trump links tariffs concessions to NAFTA progress
- Editorial: Trump has his new NAFTA. But is it any better than the original?
- Trump tariffs: Mexico retaliates against US products
- The real value of tariffs
- Trump reaches deal to lift steel, aluminum tariffs on Mexico, Canada
- US will temporarily exempt Canada and Mexico from tariffs: reports
- Trump's trade actions are heating up quickly
- Trump Discusses NAFTA, Middle East in Phone Call With Trudeau
- Trump touts NAFTA overhaul in press conference
- Donald Trump: Would He Really Scrap NAFTA and Leave NATO?
- Pelosi announces support for new Trump NAFTA deal
- China: Trump’s tariffs to have ‘huge impact’ on global trade
Trump tariffs threaten to torpedo NAFTA have 1456 words, post on thehill.com at June 3, 2018. This is cached page on VietNam Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.